🇪🇸 Canadian Grand Prix: Tactical Analysis
· 3 min read
🇪🇸 Verstappen benefited from a pace advantage of 0.18 seconds per lap, while Norris's race was compromised by unfavourable safety car timing.
Formula 1 — Race Highlights Ver en YouTube → ↗
🇪🇸 Race Tactical Thesis
🇪🇸 Verstappen, Max appears to have controlled this race. Verstappen benefited from a pace advantage of 0.18 seconds per lap, while Norris's race was compromised by unfavourable safety car timing.
🇪🇸 Decisive Tactical Sequences
🇪🇸 The safety car on lap 25 created a pivotal window: Piastri pitted. The result was decisive: tyre advantage.
The safety car on lap 25 created a pivotal window: Sainz pitted. The result was decisive: tyre advantage.
The safety car on lap 25 created a pivotal window: Gasly pitted. The result was decisive: tyre advantage.
The safety car on lap 25 created a pivotal window: Sainz pitted. The result was decisive: tyre advantage.
The safety car on lap 25 created a pivotal window: Gasly pitted. The result was decisive: tyre advantage.
🇪🇸 Pit Strategy Evolution
🇪🇸 The field split across strategy branches: Russell used I-I-H-M; Hamilton used I-I-M-H; Alonso, Gasly, Stroll used I-I-H; 7 drivers used I-I-M; Hulkenberg used W-I-I-M; Magnussen used W-I-I-M-M; Bottas, Ocon, Tsunoda used I-M; Zhou used I-I-M-M; Leclerc used I-I-H-I; Sargeant used I. Zhou pitted on lap 24 and failed to jump Piastri. Zhou pitted on lap 24 and failed to jump Sainz. The winning strategy was I-I-M, averaging P9.6.
🇪🇸 Tyre & Pace Story
🇪🇸 The wet tyres showed average degradation of -472ms per lap. The intermediate tyres showed average degradation of -859ms per lap. The medium-compound tyres showed average degradation of -765ms per lap. The hard-compound tyres showed average degradation of -733ms per lap. Albon hit a tyre cliff on lap 52 with a 2825ms drop-off. Alonso hit a tyre cliff on lap 53 with a 7399ms drop-off. Russell led the field in average race pace.
🇪🇸 Track Position Battles
🇪🇸 There were 117 on-track position changes during the race. Russell and Verstappen fought a 6-lap battle from lap 10 to 16 (closest gap: 435ms). Russell and Verstappen fought a 16-lap battle from lap 19 to 35 (closest gap: 279ms). Norris and Russell fought a 7-lap battle from lap 26 to 33 (closest gap: 532ms). The overtakes broke down as: 66 via pit undercut, 36 via DRS-assisted pass, 14 via committed racing move, 1 via safety car.
🇪🇸 Safety Car & Restart Effects
🇪🇸 A safety car was deployed from lap 25 to 28 (4 laps). Piastri, Sainz, Gasly took advantage of free pit stops under the safety car. Key beneficiaries: Russell, Bottas, Sainz. Those who lost out: Norris, Alonso, Ricciardo. A safety car was deployed from lap 53 to 57 (5 laps). Sainz, Hamilton, Russell took advantage of free pit stops under the safety car. Key beneficiaries: Bottas, Gasly, Sainz. Those who lost out: Russell.
🇪🇸 Race-Deciding Factors
🇪🇸 Tyre Management was decisively a factor (54.8% contribution). Race Pace was clearly a factor (20.1% contribution). Pit Execution was clearly a factor (8.2% contribution).
🇪🇸 What Could Have Changed
🇪🇸 *If Sainz, Carlos had finished the race without mechanical issues*: Could have scored points from their grid position. This scenario has high plausibility. (Based on 1 piece(s) of evidence.)
*If Albon, Alexander had finished the race without mechanical issues*: Could have scored points from their grid position. This scenario has high plausibility. (Based on 1 piece(s) of evidence.)
*If Albon, Alexander had finished the race without mechanical issues*: Could have scored points from their grid position. This scenario has high plausibility. (Based on 1 piece(s) of evidence.)
Race Analysis Charts
Those conclusions are visible in the race data below: the position chart, degradation profile, strategy map and Safety Car impact all point back to the same story — Leclerc won by preserving tyre performance before the race compressed.
Position Evolution
Top 10 drivers
Stint Degradation
Lap time evolution by stint and compound
Gap to Leader
Top 10 drivers (clean laps only)
Strategy Map
Tyre compound allocation per driver
Albon
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
MEDIUM
Alonso
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
HARD
Bottas
INTERMEDIATE
MEDIUM
Gasly
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
HARD
Hamilton
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
MEDIUM
HARD
Hulkenberg
WET
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
MEDIUM
Leclerc
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
HARD
INTERMEDIATE
Magnussen
WET
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
Norris
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
MEDIUM
Ocon
INTERMEDIATE
MEDIUM
Perez
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
MEDIUM
Piastri
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
MEDIUM
Ricciardo
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
MEDIUM
Russell
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
HARD
MEDIUM
Sainz
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
MEDIUM
Stroll
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
HARD
Tsunoda
INTERMEDIATE
MEDIUM
Verstappen
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
MEDIUM
Zhou
INTERMEDIATE
INTERMEDIATE
MEDIUM
Race-Deciding Factors
Factor contribution breakdown
Safety Car Impact
Gap evolution through SC periods
More Race Analysis
Race Flow
Race Flow
Race-defining position and strategy shifts
P2
P1VER
P3
P2NOR
P1
P3RUS
Verstappen, Max appears to have controlled this race. Verstappen benefited from a pace advantage of 0.18 seconds per lap, while Norris's race was compromised by unfavourable safety car timing.
¿Te fue útil?