Skip to content
Sportami home
SF outlast LA 26-23 after 3 lead changes

SF outlast LA 26-23 after 3 lead changes

SF edged LA 26-23. SF had a +2 turnover margin (2 forced, 0 committed) vs LA's -2. The defining moment: LA fails on 4th down (OT, 3:41).

Key Takeaways

  • Turning point: LA fails on 4th down (OT, 3:41) turning point
  • Key advantage: SF had a +2 turnover margin (2 forced, 0 committed) vs LA's -2 why winner won
  • Key failure: LA failed on 6/10 third downs (40% conversion rate) why loser lost
  • Game character: volatile contest with 3 lead changes momentum timeline

SF edged LA 26-23. SF had a +2 turnover margin (2 forced, 0 committed) vs LA's -2.

The defining moment: LA fails on 4th down (OT, 3:41).

why winner won turning point momentum timeline

The Turning Point

LA fails on 4th down (OT, 3:41). LA's win probability dropped from 79.9% to 0.0% — a 79.9 percentage point swing.

Ended the drive and handed field position to SF while trailing by a field goal.

turning point

🏈 Drive of the Game

LA 9-play, 88-yard drive (3:24) ending in touchdown (Q4, 14:03). LA's win probability moved from 24.8% to 53.6% — a 28.8 percentage point shift over 9 plays.

LA tied the game after trailing. Key play (WPA +0.161): (10:43) (Shotgun) 9-M.Stafford pass short left to 23-K.Williams for 8 yards, TOUCHDOWN.

Key play (WPA +0.103): (11:31) 9-M.Stafford pass deep middle to 17-D.Adams to SF 8 for 24 yards (20-U.Stout).

drive of game

📈 Game Flow

This was a volatile contest with 3 lead changes and 5 significant momentum swings. The longest sustained momentum belonged to LA, who gained 66.9 percentage points of win probability during that stretch.

The largest single swing was 79.9 percentage points, caused by a play sequence.

momentum timeline

Why SF Won

SF won 26-23 on the strength of 5 key factors: • SF had a +2 turnover margin (2 forced, 0 committed) vs LA's -2 • SF scored on 5/5 red zone trips (100%) vs LA's 3/5 (60%) • SF rushing EPA: -3.8 vs LA: -10.7.

why winner won

What Went Wrong for LA

LA lost 23-26. What went wrong: • LA failed on 6/10 third downs (40% conversion rate) • LA committed 2 turnovers (0 INTs, 2 fumbles lost) • LA failed to score on 2 of 5 red zone trips (60% scoring rate).

why loser lost

🏁 The Bottom Line

The drive that defined the game: LA 9-play, 88-yard drive (3:24) ending in touchdown (Q4, 14:03). The moment that decided it: LA fails on 4th down (OT, 3:41).

Final score: SF 26-23.

why winner won turning point drive of game

Evidence Sources

SF Play #4950 Drive #12 turnover margin red zone efficiency rushing advantage third down failures turnovers committed red zone failures

Every claim is traced to play-by-play evidence from official NFL data. Powered by Sportami Reason Engine v1.0.