DAL rout WAS 44-22
DAL dominated WAS 44-22. DAL passing EPA: +7.2 vs WAS: -19.9.
Key Takeaways
- ⚡ Turning point: D.Prescott to C.Lamb, 74-yard TD (Q1, 49:38) turning point
- ✅ Key advantage: DAL passing EPA: +7.2 vs WAS: -19.9 why winner won
- ❌ Key failure: WAS passing attack generated -19.9 EPA why loser lost
DAL dominated WAS 44-22. DAL passing EPA: +7.2 vs WAS: -19.9.
⚡ The Turning Point
D.Prescott to C.Lamb, 74-yard TD (Q1, 49:38). DAL's win probability jumped from 64.1% to 77.3% — a 13.2 percentage point swing.
Extended or established the lead while leading by a field goal.
🏈 Drive of the Game
WAS 4-play, 0-yard drive (2:13) ending in a turnover returned for a touchdown (Q3, 07:44). WAS's win probability moved from 4.7% to 99.9% — a 4.6 percentage point shift over 4 plays.
WAS's drive ended in a turnover that was returned for a touchdown by the opponent.
📈 Game Flow
A steady contest without dramatic momentum swings. The longest sustained momentum belonged to DAL, who gained 14.3 percentage points of win probability during that stretch.
✅ Why DAL Won
DAL won 44-22 on the strength of 5 key factors: • DAL passing EPA: +7.2 vs WAS: -19.9 • DAL generated +5.9 EPA (+0.098 per play) vs WAS's -14.2 EPA (-0.221 per play) • DAL had a +2 turnover margin (2 forced, 0 committed) vs WAS's -2.
❌ What Went Wrong for WAS
WAS lost 22-44. What went wrong: • WAS passing attack generated -19.9 EPA • WAS failed on 9/16 third downs (44% conversion rate) • WAS's defense allowed DAL to score on 8/12 drives (67%).
🏁 The Bottom Line
The drive that defined the game: WAS 4-play, 0-yard drive (2:13) ending in a turnover returned for a touchdown (Q3, 07:44). The moment that decided it: D.Prescott to C.Lamb, 74-yard TD (Q1, 49:38).
Final score: DAL 44-22.
Evidence Sources
Every claim is traced to play-by-play evidence from official NFL data. Powered by Sportami Reason Engine v1.0.