Skip to content
Sportami home

NE outlast MIA 33-27 after 2 lead changes

NE held off MIA 33-27. NE had a +1 turnover margin (1 forced, 0 committed) vs MIA's -1. The defining moment: MIA defensive/special teams touchdown (Q4, 7:18).

Key Takeaways

  • Turning point: MIA defensive/special teams touchdown (Q4, 7:18) turning point
  • Key advantage: NE had a +1 turnover margin (1 forced, 0 committed) vs MIA's -1 why winner won
  • Key failure: MIA failed on 6/10 third downs (40% conversion rate) why loser lost
  • Game character: volatile contest with 2 lead changes momentum timeline

NE held off MIA 33-27. NE had a +1 turnover margin (1 forced, 0 committed) vs MIA's -1.

The defining moment: MIA defensive/special teams touchdown (Q4, 7:18).

why winner won turning point momentum timeline

The Turning Point

MIA defensive/special teams touchdown (Q4, 7:18). NE's win probability jumped from 29.3% to 59.6% — a 30.3 percentage point swing.

Points off a turnover swung momentum decisively while trailing by one score.

turning point

🏈 Drive of the Game

NE 5-play, 83-yard drive (3:31) ending in touchdown (Q3, 03:37). NE's win probability moved from 28.4% to 59.0% — a 30.6 percentage point shift over 5 plays.

NE took the lead for the first time on this drive. Key play (WPA +0.173): (1:49) (Shotgun) 10-D.Maye pass deep right to 38-R.Stevenson to MIA 21 for 55 yards (20-J.Brooks).

Key play (WPA +0.071): TWO-POINT CONVERSION ATTEMPT. 38-R.Stevenson rushes up the middle.

ATTEMPT SUCCEEDS. Key play (WPA +0.057): (:12) (Shotgun) 10-D.Maye scrambles right end for 6 yards, TOUCHDOWN.

Penalty on MIA-25-T.Dodson, De.

drive of game

📈 Game Flow

This was a volatile contest with 2 lead changes and 5 significant momentum swings. The longest sustained momentum belonged to NE, who lost 32.4 percentage points of win probability during that stretch.

The largest single swing was 30.3 percentage points, caused by a defensive touchdown.

momentum timeline

Why NE Won

NE won 33-27 on the strength of 5 key factors: • NE had a +1 turnover margin (1 forced, 0 committed) vs MIA's -1 • NE generated +18.2 EPA (+0.344 per play) vs MIA's +8.8 EPA (+0.170 per play) • NE converted 7/12 third downs (58%) vs MIA's 4/10 (40%).

why winner won

What Went Wrong for MIA

MIA lost 27-33. What went wrong: • MIA failed on 6/10 third downs (40% conversion rate) • MIA's defense allowed NE to score on 7/10 drives (70%) • MIA allowed 5 sacks.

why loser lost

🏁 The Bottom Line

The drive that defined the game: NE 5-play, 83-yard drive (3:31) ending in touchdown (Q3, 03:37). The moment that decided it: MIA defensive/special teams touchdown (Q4, 7:18).

Final score: NE 33-27.

why winner won turning point drive of game

Evidence Sources

NE Play #3418 Drive #11 turnover margin epa advantage third down efficiency third down failures defensive leakage pressure allowed

Every claim is traced to play-by-play evidence from official NFL data. Powered by Sportami Reason Engine v1.0.