Skip to content
Sportami home

LA survive CHI challenge, win 20-17

LA edged CHI 20-17. LA had a +3 turnover margin (3 forced, 0 committed) vs CHI's -3. The defining moment: C.Williams to C.Kmet, 14-yard TD (Q4, 0:27).

Key Takeaways

  • Turning point: C.Williams to C.Kmet, 14-yard TD (Q4, 0:27) turning point
  • Key advantage: LA had a +3 turnover margin (3 forced, 0 committed) vs CHI's -3 why winner won
  • Key failure: CHI committed 3 turnovers (3 INTs, 0 fumbles lost) why loser lost

LA edged CHI 20-17. LA had a +3 turnover margin (3 forced, 0 committed) vs CHI's -3.

The defining moment: C.Williams to C.Kmet, 14-yard TD (Q4, 0:27).

why winner won turning point momentum timeline

The Turning Point

C.Williams to C.Kmet, 14-yard TD (Q4, 0:27). CHI's win probability jumped from 13.2% to 41.0% — a 27.8 percentage point swing.

Changed the scoreboard and shifted control while trailing by one score.

turning point

🏈 Drive of the Game

LA 10-play, 54-yard drive (3:20) ending in field goal (OT, 06:39). LA's win probability moved from 39.9% to 100.0% — a 60.1 percentage point shift over 10 plays.

LA took the lead with a field goal. Key play (WPA +0.260): (4:54) (Shotgun) 9-M.Stafford pass short right to 12-P.Nacua to CHI 27 for 16 yards (1-J.Johnson).

Key play (WPA +0.165): (3:24) 92-H.Mevis 42 yard field goal is GOOD, Center-44-J.McQuaide, Holder-42-E.Evans. Key play (WPA +0.128): (6:17) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 9-M.Stafford pass short right to 84-C.Parkinson pushed ob at LA 41 for 1.

drive of game

📈 Game Flow

A back-and-forth battle with 4 lead changes kept both teams in contention throughout. The longest sustained momentum belonged to CHI, who gained 29.8 percentage points of win probability during that stretch.

The largest single swing was 27.8 percentage points, caused by a touchdown.

momentum timeline

Why LA Won

LA won 20-17 on the strength of 4 key factors: • LA had a +3 turnover margin (3 forced, 0 committed) vs CHI's -3 • LA scored on 3/3 red zone trips (100%) vs CHI's 2/3 (67%) • LA rushing EPA: +1.4 vs CHI: -4.5.

why winner won

What Went Wrong for CHI

CHI lost 17-20. What went wrong: • CHI committed 3 turnovers (3 INTs, 0 fumbles lost) • CHI forced only 0 turnovers while LA forced 3 • CHI failed to score on 1 of 3 red zone trips (67% scoring rate).

why loser lost

🏁 The Bottom Line

The drive that defined the game: LA 10-play, 54-yard drive (3:20) ending in field goal (OT, 06:39). The moment that decided it: C.Williams to C.Kmet, 14-yard TD (Q4, 0:27).

Final score: LA 20-17.

why winner won turning point drive of game

Evidence Sources

LA Play #4009 Drive #24 turnover margin red zone efficiency rushing advantage turnovers committed failed to force turnovers red zone failures

Every claim is traced to play-by-play evidence from official NFL data. Powered by Sportami Reason Engine v1.0.