Skip to content
Sportami home

CHI hold off WAS, win 25-24 on late field goal

CHI edged WAS 25-24. CHI had a +3 turnover margin (3 forced, 0 committed) vs WAS's -3. The defining moment: CHI 38-yard field goal (Q4, 0:03).

Key Takeaways

  • Turning point: CHI 38-yard field goal (Q4, 0:03) turning point
  • Key advantage: CHI had a +3 turnover margin (3 forced, 0 committed) vs WAS's -3 why winner won
  • Key failure: WAS committed 3 turnovers (1 INT, 2 fumbles lost) why loser lost
  • Game character: volatile contest with 2 lead changes momentum timeline

CHI edged WAS 25-24. CHI had a +3 turnover margin (3 forced, 0 committed) vs WAS's -3.

The defining moment: CHI 38-yard field goal (Q4, 0:03).

why winner won turning point momentum timeline

The Turning Point

CHI 38-yard field goal (Q4, 0:03). CHI's win probability jumped from 56.6% to 100.0% — a 43.4 percentage point swing.

Points on the board while trailing by a field goal.

turning point

🏈 Drive of the Game

CHI 9-play, 36-yard drive (3:07) ending in field goal (Q4, 03:07). CHI's win probability moved from 40.8% to 56.6% — a 68.9 percentage point shift over 9 plays.

CHI added points with a field goal. Key play (WPA +0.434): (:03) 16-J.Moody 38 yard field goal is GOOD, Center-46-S.Daly, Holder-19-T.Taylor.

Key play (WPA +0.171): (1:14) 4-D.Swift right end to WAS 18 for 15 yards (54-B.Wagner). Key play (WPA +0.102): (2:00) (Shotgun) 18-C.Williams pass short right to 84-C.Loveland to WAS 45 for 6 yards (4-F.Luvu).

drive of game

📈 Game Flow

This was a volatile contest with 2 lead changes and 5 significant momentum swings. The longest sustained momentum belonged to CHI, who lost 51.1 percentage points of win probability during that stretch.

The largest single swing was 43.4 percentage points, caused by a field goal.

momentum timeline

Why CHI Won

CHI won 25-24 on the strength of 4 key factors: • CHI had a +3 turnover margin (3 forced, 0 committed) vs WAS's -3 • CHI rushing EPA: +6.5 vs WAS: -10.2 • CHI generated +9.8 EPA (+0.166 per play) vs WAS's -3.8 EPA (-0.064 per play).

why winner won

What Went Wrong for WAS

WAS lost 24-25. What went wrong: • WAS committed 3 turnovers (1 INT, 2 fumbles lost) • WAS failed on 5/8 third downs (38% conversion rate) • WAS forced only 0 turnovers while CHI forced 3.

why loser lost

🏁 The Bottom Line

The drive that defined the game: CHI 9-play, 36-yard drive (3:07) ending in field goal (Q4, 03:07). The moment that decided it: CHI 38-yard field goal (Q4, 0:03).

Final score: CHI 25-24.

why winner won turning point drive of game

Evidence Sources

CHI Play #4268 Drive #20 turnover margin rushing advantage epa advantage turnovers committed third down failures failed to force turnovers

Every claim is traced to play-by-play evidence from official NFL data. Powered by Sportami Reason Engine v1.0.