Skip to content
Sportami home

CHI hold off MIN, win 19-17 on late field goal

CHI edged MIN 19-17. CHI had a +2 turnover margin (2 forced, 0 committed) vs MIN's -2. The defining moment: CHI 48-yard field goal (Q4, 0:04).

Key Takeaways

  • Turning point: CHI 48-yard field goal (Q4, 0:04) turning point
  • Key advantage: CHI had a +2 turnover margin (2 forced, 0 committed) vs MIN's -2 why winner won
  • Key failure: MIN failed on 8/11 third downs (27% conversion rate) why loser lost
  • Game character: volatile contest with 2 lead changes momentum timeline

CHI edged MIN 19-17. CHI had a +2 turnover margin (2 forced, 0 committed) vs MIN's -2.

The defining moment: CHI 48-yard field goal (Q4, 0:04).

why winner won turning point momentum timeline

The Turning Point

CHI 48-yard field goal (Q4, 0:04). CHI's win probability jumped from 56.1% to 100.0% — a 43.9 percentage point swing.

Points on the board while trailing by a field goal.

turning point

🏈 Drive of the Game

MIN 10-play, 85-yard drive (2:24) ending in touchdown (Q4, 03:14). MIN's win probability moved from 17.0% to 57.6% — a 40.6 percentage point shift over 10 plays.

MIN took the lead for the first time on this drive. Key play (WPA +0.185): (:56) (Shotgun) 9-J.McCarthy pass short left to 3-J.Addison for 15 yards, TOUCHDOWN.

Key play (WPA +0.111): (1:01) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 9-J.McCarthy pass short right to 1-J.Nailor ran ob at CHI 15 for 16 yard Key play (WPA +0.068): (1:59) (Shotgun) 9-J.McCarthy pass short right to 3-J.Addison to 50 for 5 yards (24-N.McCloud) [49-T.

drive of game

📈 Game Flow

This was a volatile contest with 2 lead changes and 5 significant momentum swings. The longest sustained momentum belonged to MIN, who gained 33.7 percentage points of win probability during that stretch.

The largest single swing was 43.9 percentage points, caused by a field goal.

momentum timeline

Why CHI Won

CHI won 19-17 on the strength of 5 key factors: • CHI had a +2 turnover margin (2 forced, 0 committed) vs MIN's -2 • CHI passing EPA: -0.9 vs MIN: -13.1 • CHI generated -3.5 EPA (-0.048 per play) vs MIN's -10.4 EPA (-0.193 per play).

why winner won

What Went Wrong for MIN

MIN lost 17-19. What went wrong: • MIN failed on 8/11 third downs (27% conversion rate) • MIN committed 2 turnovers (2 INTs, 0 fumbles lost) • MIN passing attack generated -13.1 EPA.

why loser lost

🏁 The Bottom Line

The drive that defined the game: MIN 10-play, 85-yard drive (2:24) ending in touchdown (Q4, 03:14). The moment that decided it: CHI 48-yard field goal (Q4, 0:04).

Final score: CHI 19-17.

why winner won turning point drive of game

Evidence Sources

CHI Play #4228 Drive #23 turnover margin passing advantage epa advantage third down failures turnovers committed passing struggles

Every claim is traced to play-by-play evidence from official NFL data. Powered by Sportami Reason Engine v1.0.