Skip to content
Sportami home
NO defeat TEN 34-26

NO defeat TEN 34-26

NO defeated TEN 34-26. NO generated +12.5 EPA (+0.245 per play) vs TEN's -13.0 EPA (-0.181 per play). The defining moment: C.Olave 60-yard gain (Q4, 7:59).

Key Takeaways

  • Turning point: C.Olave 60-yard gain (Q4, 7:59) turning point
  • Key advantage: NO generated +12.5 EPA (+0.245 per play) vs TEN's -13.0 EPA (-0.181 per play) why winner won
  • Key failure: TEN failed on 11/16 third downs (31% conversion rate) why loser lost

NO defeated TEN 34-26. NO generated +12.5 EPA (+0.245 per play) vs TEN's -13.0 EPA (-0.181 per play).

The defining moment: C.Olave 60-yard gain (Q4, 7:59).

why winner won turning point momentum timeline

The Turning Point

C.Olave 60-yard gain (Q4, 7:59). NO's win probability jumped from 21.3% to 40.6% — a 19.3 percentage point swing.

A -yard gain moved the chains and shifted field position while trailing by one score.

turning point

🏈 Drive of the Game

NO 4-play, 80-yard drive (2:23) ending in touchdown (Q4, 08:45). NO's win probability moved from 18.2% to 47.4% — a 29.2 percentage point shift over 4 plays.

NO took the lead for the first time on this drive. Key play (WPA +0.193): (7:59) (Shotgun) 6-T.Shough pass deep left to 12-C.Olave to TEN 8 for 60 yards (39-D.Baker) [92-J.Ha Key play (WPA +0.072): (6:26) (Shotgun) 6-T.Shough pass short left to 81-K.Austin for 10 yards, TOUCHDOWN.

drive of game

📈 Game Flow

A competitive game with 5 significant momentum shifts provided sustained tension. The longest sustained momentum belonged to NO, who lost 48.5 percentage points of win probability during that stretch.

The largest single swing was 19.3 percentage points, caused by a explosive play.

momentum timeline

Why NO Won

NO won 34-26 on the strength of 5 key factors: • NO generated +12.5 EPA (+0.245 per play) vs TEN's -13.0 EPA (-0.181 per play) • NO passing EPA: +11.3 vs TEN: -8.6 • NO rushing EPA: +1.2 vs TEN: -4.4.

why winner won

What Went Wrong for TEN

TEN lost 26-34. What went wrong: • TEN failed on 11/16 third downs (31% conversion rate) • TEN generated -13.0 EPA (-0.181 per play) • TEN allowed 4 sacks.

why loser lost

🏁 The Bottom Line

The drive that defined the game: NO 4-play, 80-yard drive (2:23) ending in touchdown (Q4, 08:45). The moment that decided it: C.Olave 60-yard gain (Q4, 7:59).

Final score: NO 34-26.

why winner won turning point drive of game

Evidence Sources

NO Play #3376 Drive #18 epa advantage passing advantage rushing advantage third down failures offensive inefficiency pressure allowed

Every claim is traced to play-by-play evidence from official NFL data. Powered by Sportami Reason Engine v1.0.