Skip to content
Sportami home

LAC outlast MIA 29-27 in back-and-forth battle

LAC edged MIA 29-27. LAC had a +2 turnover margin (3 forced, 1 committed) vs MIA's -2. The defining moment: L.McConkey 42-yard gain (Q4, 0:34).

Key Takeaways

  • Turning point: L.McConkey 42-yard gain (Q4, 0:34) turning point
  • Key advantage: LAC had a +2 turnover margin (3 forced, 1 committed) vs MIA's -2 why winner won
  • Key failure: MIA committed 3 turnovers (3 INTs, 0 fumbles lost) why loser lost
  • Game character: volatile contest with 5 lead changes momentum timeline

LAC edged MIA 29-27. LAC had a +2 turnover margin (3 forced, 1 committed) vs MIA's -2.

The defining moment: L.McConkey 42-yard gain (Q4, 0:34).

why winner won turning point momentum timeline

The Turning Point

L.McConkey 42-yard gain (Q4, 0:34). LAC's win probability jumped from 37.0% to 74.1% — a 37.0 percentage point swing.

A -yard gain moved the chains and shifted field position while trailing by a field goal.

turning point

🏈 Drive of the Game

MIA 13-play, 82-yard drive (5:33) ending in touchdown (Q4, 06:19). MIA's win probability moved from 19.8% to 60.9% — a 41.1 percentage point shift over 13 plays.

MIA took the lead for the first time on this drive. Key play (WPA +0.249): (:52) (Shotgun) 1-T.Tagovailoa pass short right to 83-D.Waller for 7 yards, TOUCHDOWN.

Key play (WPA +0.083): (1:11) (Shotgun) 1-T.Tagovailoa pass short middle to 89-J.Hill to LAC 10 for 14 yards (2-E.Molden, 3 Key play (WPA -0.081): (:59) 1-T.Tagovailoa pass short left to 6-M.Washington pushed ob at LAC 7 for no gain (29-T.Still).

drive of game

📈 Game Flow

This was a volatile contest with 5 lead changes and 5 significant momentum swings. The longest sustained momentum belonged to LAC, who lost 57.2 percentage points of win probability during that stretch.

The largest single swing was 37.0 percentage points, caused by a explosive play.

momentum timeline

Why LAC Won

LAC won 29-27 on the strength of 5 key factors: • LAC had a +2 turnover margin (3 forced, 1 committed) vs MIA's -2 • LAC scored on 7/10 drives (70%) vs MIA's 5/11 (46%) • LAC passing EPA: +6.9 vs MIA: -0.6.

why winner won

What Went Wrong for MIA

MIA lost 27-29. What went wrong: • MIA committed 3 turnovers (3 INTs, 0 fumbles lost) • MIA's defense allowed LAC to score on 7/10 drives (70%) • MIA forced only 1 turnover while LAC forced 3.

why loser lost

🏁 The Bottom Line

The drive that defined the game: MIA 13-play, 82-yard drive (5:33) ending in touchdown (Q4, 06:19). The moment that decided it: L.McConkey 42-yard gain (Q4, 0:34).

Final score: LAC 29-27.

why winner won turning point drive of game

Evidence Sources

LAC Play #4010 Drive #19 turnover margin scoring drive rate passing advantage turnovers committed defensive leakage failed to force turnovers

Every claim is traced to play-by-play evidence from official NFL data. Powered by Sportami Reason Engine v1.0.