Skip to content
Sportami home

CIN survive CLE scare, win 17-16 after late interception

CIN edged CLE 17-16. CIN had a +2 turnover margin (2 forced, 0 committed) vs CLE's -2. The defining moment: J.Flacco intercepted (Q4, 1:30).

Key Takeaways

  • Turning point: J.Flacco intercepted (Q4, 1:30) turning point
  • Key advantage: CIN had a +2 turnover margin (2 forced, 0 committed) vs CLE's -2 why winner won
  • Key failure: CLE committed 2 turnovers (2 INTs, 0 fumbles lost) why loser lost
  • Game character: volatile contest with 1 lead change momentum timeline

CIN edged CLE 17-16. CIN had a +2 turnover margin (2 forced, 0 committed) vs CLE's -2.

The defining moment: J.Flacco intercepted (Q4, 1:30).

why winner won turning point momentum timeline

The Turning Point

J.Flacco intercepted (Q4, 1:30). CLE's win probability dropped from 57.6% to 12.4% — a 45.2 percentage point swing.

Gave CIN the ball and ended CLE's threat while trailing by a field goal.

turning point

🏈 Drive of the Game

CLE 16-play, 67-yard drive (9:50) ending in touchdown (Q1, 07:32). CLE's win probability moved from 38.6% to 56.1% — a 17.6 percentage point shift over 16 plays.

CLE tied the game after trailing. Key play (WPA +0.138): (12:44) 98-A.Huntington reported in as eligible.

35-R.Sanders right tackle for 1 yard, TOUCHDOWN. Key play (WPA +0.065): (4:11) 98-A.Huntington reported in as eligible.

35-R.Sanders up the middle to CIN 46 for 2 yards (44 Key play (WPA -0.056): (13:20) 98-A.Huntington and 56-L.Wypler reported in as eligible. 35-R.Sanders right tackle to CIN 1 .

drive of game

📈 Game Flow

This was a volatile contest with 1 lead change and 5 significant momentum swings. The longest sustained momentum belonged to CIN, who lost 57.6 percentage points of win probability during that stretch.

The largest single swing was 45.2 percentage points, caused by a interception.

momentum timeline

Why CIN Won

CIN won 17-16 on the strength of 2 key factors: • CIN had a +2 turnover margin (2 forced, 0 committed) vs CLE's -2 • CIN scored on 3/3 red zone trips (100%) vs CLE's 2/3 (67%).

why winner won

What Went Wrong for CLE

CLE lost 16-17. What went wrong: • CLE committed 2 turnovers (2 INTs, 0 fumbles lost) • CLE forced only 0 turnovers while CIN forced 2 • CLE failed to score on 1 of 3 red zone trips (67% scoring rate).

why loser lost

🏁 The Bottom Line

The drive that defined the game: CLE 16-play, 67-yard drive (9:50) ending in touchdown (Q1, 07:32). The moment that decided it: J.Flacco intercepted (Q4, 1:30).

Final score: CIN 17-16.

why winner won turning point drive of game

Evidence Sources

CIN Play #3915 Drive #2 turnover margin red zone efficiency turnovers committed failed to force turnovers red zone failures

Every claim is traced to play-by-play evidence from official NFL data. Powered by Sportami Reason Engine v1.0.