Skip to content
Sportami home

SF outlast CHI 42-38 after 2 lead changes

SF held off CHI 42-38. SF scored on 5/5 red zone trips (100%) vs CHI's 2/3 (67%). The defining moment: CHI pass (Q4, 0:04).

Key Takeaways

  • Turning point: CHI pass (Q4, 0:04) turning point
  • Key advantage: SF scored on 5/5 red zone trips (100%) vs CHI's 2/3 (67%) why winner won
  • Key failure: CHI's defense allowed SF to score on 7/10 drives (70%) why loser lost
  • Game character: volatile contest with 2 lead changes momentum timeline

SF held off CHI 42-38. SF scored on 5/5 red zone trips (100%) vs CHI's 2/3 (67%).

The defining moment: CHI pass (Q4, 0:04).

why winner won turning point momentum timeline

The Turning Point

CHI pass (Q4, 0:04). CHI's win probability dropped from 46.5% to 0.0% — a 46.5 percentage point swing.

A key completion sustained the drive while trailing by one score.

turning point

🏈 Drive of the Game

SF 7-play, 75-yard drive (3:07) ending in touchdown (Q4, 05:22). SF's win probability moved from 39.6% to 75.3% — a 35.8 percentage point shift over 7 plays.

SF took the lead for the first time on this drive. Key play (WPA +0.250): (2:23) (Shotgun) 13-B.Purdy pass deep middle to 15-J.Jennings for 38 yards, TOUCHDOWN.

Key play (WPA +0.102): (3:14) 13-B.Purdy pass short right to 23-C.McCaffrey pushed ob at CHI 38 for 18 yards (98-M.Sweat; 9 Key play (WPA +0.054): (3:18) (Shotgun) 13-B.Purdy pass incomplete short right to 88-J.Tonges. PENALTY on CHI-99-G.Dexter, .

drive of game

📈 Game Flow

This was a volatile contest with 2 lead changes and 5 significant momentum swings. The longest sustained momentum belonged to SF, who gained 50.0 percentage points of win probability during that stretch.

The largest single swing was 46.5 percentage points, caused by a play sequence.

momentum timeline

Why SF Won

SF won 42-38 on the strength of 4 key factors: • SF scored on 5/5 red zone trips (100%) vs CHI's 2/3 (67%) • SF converted 7/10 third downs (70%) vs CHI's 6/12 (50%) • SF scored on 7/10 drives (70%) vs CHI's 5/9 (56%).

why winner won

What Went Wrong for CHI

CHI lost 38-42. What went wrong: • CHI's defense allowed SF to score on 7/10 drives (70%) • CHI failed to score on 1 of 3 red zone trips (67% scoring rate).

why loser lost

🏁 The Bottom Line

The drive that defined the game: SF 7-play, 75-yard drive (3:07) ending in touchdown (Q4, 05:22). The moment that decided it: CHI pass (Q4, 0:04).

Final score: SF 42-38.

why winner won turning point drive of game

Evidence Sources

SF Play #4397 Drive #18 red zone efficiency third down efficiency scoring drive rate defensive leakage red zone failures

Every claim is traced to play-by-play evidence from official NFL data. Powered by Sportami Reason Engine v1.0.